![]() The volume is calculated by multiplying together each dimension and then converting it into the selected volumetric units. This is the volume of the rectangular shape which corresponds to the dimensions entered for length, width and height. thousandth of an inch (thou) – 0.0000254 m.The following SI unit conversion factors in metres (m) are used for converting the measurement units specified for length, width and height: SI Metric Prefix Length Units Volume Dimensions – Length, Width & HeightĮnter the measurement of length, width and height for the rectangular shape. The formula used by this calculator to calculate the volume of a rectangular shaped object is: Also a graphic will be shown of a scaled 3D drawing to the correct proportions and labelled with each dimension and calculated volume. Once the measurements have been entered for length, width and height, the calculated volume will be shown in the answer box. There is no need to input values in the same measurement units, just select your preferred units for each dimension and calculated volume. This online tool calculates the volume of a rectangular shaped box, solid or space from the dimensions of length, width and height. Cubic Metres SI Metric Prefix Volumetric Units.Volume Dimensions – Length, Width & Height.I plan to update it to a newer version soon and that update should bring in a bunch of new word senses for many words (or more accurately, lemma). Special thanks to the contributors of the open-source code that was used in this project: the UBY project (mentioned above), and express.js.Ĭurrently, this is based on a version of wiktionary which is a few years old. I simply extracted the Wiktionary entries and threw them into this interface! So it took a little more work than expected, but I'm happy I kept at it after the first couple of blunders. The researchers have parsed the whole of Wiktionary and other sources, and compiled everything into a single unified resource. That's when I stumbled across the UBY project - an amazing project which needs more recognition. However, after a day's work wrangling it into a database I realised that there were far too many errors (especially with the part-of-speech tagging) for it to be viable for Word Type.įinally, I went back to Wiktionary - which I already knew about, but had been avoiding because it's not properly structured for parsing. This caused me to investigate the 1913 edition of Websters Dictionary - which is now in the public domain. ![]() I initially started with WordNet, but then realised that it was missing many types of words/lemma (determiners, pronouns, abbreviations, and many more). The dictionary is based on the amazing Wiktionary project by wikimedia. And since I already had a lot of the infrastructure in place from the other two sites, I figured it wouldn't be too much more work to get this up and running. I had an idea for a website that simply explains the word types of the words that you search for - just like a dictionary, but focussed on the part of speech of the words. Both of those projects are based around words, but have much grander goals. ![]() For those interested in a little info about this site: it's a side project that I developed while working on Describing Words and Related Words.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |